In an ambitious move to manage population growth, Canada announced plans to curb immigration from 2025 to 2027.
However, a recent analysis by Desjardins, one of Canada’s leading financial institutions, casts doubt on whether these targets will be met.
According to their report released on February 13, 2025, the current pace of reducing non-permanent residents (NPRs) isn’t sufficient to bring the numbers down to the government’s desired levels.
Table of Contents
Key Insights of the Report
Immigration Slowdown Not Enough: Despite efforts, Canada might not achieve its immigration reduction goals.
Non-Permanent Residents: The influx is still too high to meet the desired population control targets.
Economic Pressures: Labour shortages and potential US tariffs could influence policy adjustments.
Desjardins’ Analysis
The Desjardins report, authored by economic analyst LJ Valencia and deputy chief economist Randall Bartlett, utilized data from Statistics Canada’s Labour Force Survey to analyze the trends.
They noted a significant year-over-year decrease in new non-permanent resident permit holders by 25% in the last quarter of 2024.
However, the total number of NPRs still increased by about 40,000, reaching approximately 7.5% of the Canadian population by year’s end, which is far from the government’s target of under 5%.
Population Growth and Policy Challenges
The report indicates that while the government’s strategy is showing some signs of slowing population growth, the current projections for NPRs suggest that the pace isn’t adequate.
“Our population projection is mostly unchanged,” the authors note, emphasizing the need for more aggressive measures to reduce NPR numbers or increase outbound migration to meet population control objectives.
Government’s Immigration Strategy
The Canadian government’s plan includes:
Permanent Residents: Aimed to reduce the number of new admissions as part of a broader strategy to stabilize population growth.
Temporary Residents: Plans to welcome 445,901 in 2025, reducing to 445,662 in 2026, yet current trends suggest these numbers might be exceeded.
Economic Implications
Desjardins raises concerns about the economic fallout from these policies, particularly in light of potential reciprocal tariffs from the US under President Donald Trump.
Such tariffs could precipitate a recession, potentially reducing the demand for temporary labour, inadvertently aiding the government in meeting its immigration targets.
Corporate Influence and Labour Shortages
The report also touches on the Canadian corporate anxiety over labour shortages, which might pressure the government to adjust its policies for immigrants.
High job vacancies in key sectors could lead to a push for more flexible controls to ensure economic stability and growth.
Public and Administrative Challenges
The feasibility of these policy changes is questioned due to historical difficulties in policy execution and the administrative burden of such shifts.
The Desjardins report suggests that the path to reducing immigration to the planned levels is fraught with challenges, including managing public perception and the operational logistics of control.
Looking Forward
The narrative around the Canadian system for immigrants is complex, balancing economic needs and sustainable growth.
With ongoing adjustments, the government’s ability to meet its immigration targets will be closely watched.
Desjardins remains skeptical about the immediate success of these policies but acknowledges that external economic factors might inadvertently align with these goals sooner than anticipated.
The Canadian journey towards managing its population through the policy is ongoing.
The Desjardins report highlights not just the challenges but also the dynamic interplay of economic, political, and social factors that will determine the success or failure of these initiatives.
As the country navigates these waters, the implications for its economic landscape and social fabric will be profound.
In conclusion, Canada’s journey to refine its immigration policies to align with population control goals is a multifaceted challenge.
Desjardins’ analysis indicates that while initial steps are being taken, the path forward is complex, influenced by economic pressures, administrative capabilities, and external factors like U.S. policy decisions.
Achieving a balance between economic needs and sustainable growth will require nuanced adjustments and perhaps a reevaluation of current strategies.
As the government navigates these waters, the broader implications for Canada’s social and economic landscape remain significant.
The coming years will be critical in determining whether these ambitious targets can be met or if they will need to be recalibrated.
Stakeholders from all sectors will watch closely, as the outcomes will shape Canada’s future demographic and economic profile.
Stay updated with CTC News.
