Chinese tariffs on Canadian agricultural products, such as canola, have intensified calls for the Canadian government to reconsider its 100% surtax on electric vehicles (EVs) imported from China, which was implemented on October 1, 2024, in alignment with similar measures by the United States and the European Union.
Canadian government is actively reviewing its 100% tariff on electric vehicles (EVs) imported from China, a policy that could dramatically alter the nation’s automotive and agricultural landscapes.
This potential policy reversal, announced by Agriculture Minister Heath MacDonald on September 9, 2025, during a federal-provincial agriculture ministers’ conference in Winnipeg, signals a pragmatic pivot in Ottawa’s approach to global trade.
MacDonald, speaking to reporters after the meeting, emphasized that easing the tariff is “certainly something that we’re looking at” as part of broader efforts to reopen China’s market for Canadian exports, but he stressed the need to balance this against impacts on other sectors like manufacturing.
The review, mandated one year after the tariff’s imposition in October 2024, is set for completion by October 1, 2025, and comes amid a perfect storm of retaliatory measures from Beijing, including crippling duties on Canadian canola that have left prairie farmers reeling.
With Prime Minister Mark Carney’s administration already delaying key EV mandates and unveiling billions in trade relief, this decision looms as a high-stakes chess move: one that could unlock ultra-affordable Chinese EVs priced as low as C$14,000—such as BYD’s compact Seagull model with its 305 km range—offering much-needed relief to consumers battered by inflation and soaring vehicle costs.
Yet, as critics from the auto industry thunder warnings of an “existential threat” to domestic jobs, the debate rages: Will this ignite a green mobility boom, fortify ties with China, and blunt the edge of U.S. President Donald Trump‘s aggressive tariffs, or will it trigger economic fallout for Canada’s beleaguered manufacturing heartland?
To understand the gravity of this moment, it’s essential to rewind to the tariff’s origins.
Last fall, under then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Canada aligned with the U.S. and EU by slapping a 100% surtax on Chinese EVs, citing Beijing’s “unfair subsidies” estimated at US$230 billion and state-driven overcapacity that threatened North American producers.
The move was lauded by Ontario’s auto lobby, where giants like General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis employ over 100,000 workers across assembly plants in Windsor, Oshawa, and Ingersoll. It also included a 25% levy on Chinese steel and aluminum, aiming to nurture Canada’s nascent EV supply chain—from battery gigafactories in Quebec to cathode production in B.C.
At the time, the policy seemed a bulwark against a Chinese onslaught; models like XPeng’s G6 or NIO’s ET5, boasting advanced autonomy and prices 50-70% below rivals, were poised to undercut local innovation.
“We feel vindicated,” proclaimed Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association (APMA), in the wake of the announcement.
But 2025 has upended that calculus. Trump’s February executive order imposed 25% tariffs on nearly all Canadian imports—escalating to 35% by July despite USMCA safeguards—framing them as leverage against fentanyl and border issues, while publicly musing about annexing Canada as the “51st state.”
Canada fired back with mirrored duties on U.S. autos and metals, but the fallout has been brutal: TD Economics forecasts a 10-15% spike in new and used vehicle prices, exacerbating an affordability crisis where the average car now costs C$48,000.
Enter Carney, the former Bank of England governor who ascended to the premiership in March 2025 amid the chaos, vowing a “climate-competitive” economy.
On September 5, he unveiled a sweeping response: a $5-billion resilience fund for tariff-hit firms, EI reforms to speed benefits and extend coverage for long-tenured workers, and a mandatory “Buy Canadian” procurement policy for all federal entities.
Crucially, he paused the 2026 EV sales mandate—requiring 20% of new vehicles to be zero-emission—citing automakers’ “enough on their plate” amid the trade rupture, and kicked off a 60-day policy overhaul to inject “flexibilities and cost reductions.”
The 2035 all-ZEV target remains, but skeptics like Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre decry it as a “clumsy retreat,” accusing Carney of flip-flopping from his pre-office zeal for a 2030 gas-car ban.
Layered atop this is the canola catastrophe, the tariffs’ most visceral blow. China, sourcing 90% of its canola from Canada—worth $5 billion annually in seeds, oil, and meal—retaliated swiftly.
In March 2025, Beijing hit oil and meal with 100% duties, followed by a provisional 75.8% anti-dumping levy on seeds effective August 14, effectively sealing the market.
The probe, self-launched in September 2024, alleges Canadian subsidies distort prices; Ottawa denies it, calling it “economic coercion.”
Impacts are stark: Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe dubbed it a “gut punch,” with per-farm losses topping $100,000 in the Peace River region alone.
National prices dipped pre-harvest, and the Canola Council warns of a $1-billion hit if unresolved.
Carney’s $370-million biofuel incentive package, announced September 5, aims to pivot exports toward renewables, but industry head Chris Davison slams it as “missing the mark,” ignoring processors and exporters.
Alberta’s Danielle Smith and Moe, now on a trade mission to Beijing with parliamentary secretary Kody Blois, urge swapping EV tariffs for canola relief—echoing calls from Manitoba’s Ron Kostyshyn for provincial consultations.
“We’re here to support the farmer first,” MacDonald affirmed, hinting at more aid if talks stall.
For consumers, the tariff review tantalizes with affordability. With few EVs under $45,000—versus Chinese bargains at $14,000 pre-tariff—buyers are sidelined.
Statistics Canada data underscores the slump: 2025 saw fully electric sales crater 39.2% year-over-year, with ZEVs (including plug-ins) down 29.5% to 37,000 units and market share at a dismal 8.6%, half of Q4 2024’s 18.3%.
June alone plunged 35%, the fifth straight monthly drop, as H1 totals fell 29.8% to 79,476 units.
Culprits abound: The federal iZEV rebate’s $5,000 vanished in January after funds dried, sparking a pre-deadline frenzy but leaving a void.
Quebec slashed Roulez Vert from $7,000 to $4,000 then paused it February-April, tanking sales 65% in B.C. suspended CleanBC and barred Tesla amid Elon Musk’s Trump ties.
S&P Global pegs ZEV adoption at 9.7%, down from 12.5% YoY, with EVs specifically dropping 56.1% from 2024.
Quebec, once 50% of national sales, saw 50%+ declines; hybrids surged 60.7% as buyers hedge
The “Musk factor” amplifies the pain. Tesla, once 50% of Canada’s EV market, shriveled to under 10% by April, with sales crashing 70% from December 2024 amid Musk’s Trump endorsement and “far-right” rhetoric fueling boycotts—from Montreal sticker campaigns to B.C.’s program exclusions.
Post-rebate price hikes of $4,000-$9,000 sealed the deal; Q1 global Tesla profits tumbled as rivals like Polestar dangled $5,000 switcher discounts.
Broader woes compound: Trump’s tariffs inflate costs 10-20%, unemployment hit 7.1% after August’s 66,000 job losses, and Nanos polls show 62% of Canadians back tariff drops for affordability—38% cite price as the top EV factor, only 8% prioritize “Made in Canada.”
Yet, the auto sector’s alarms are deafening. Volpe warns a tariff lift could “hammer” sales, mirroring Mexico’s saga: EV share leaped from 4% to 33% in five years via Chinese imports, prompting a hike from 20% to 50% on September 11, 2025, to shield 325,000 jobs.
Chinese EVs boast superior batteries and 5-minute charges, but lack local sourcing—rippling to mining and parts, with no Canadian content.
U.S. backlash looms; Trump eyes 100-200% on Mexican-Chinese “backdoors,” potentially dragging Canada into the fray.
Experts like those at the Toronto Star foresee an “existential threat,” urging joint ventures or phased reductions (e.g., 50% initial) over outright scrapping.
| Key Trade-Offs in Tariff Review | Potential Gains | Potential Risks |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Affordability | $10K+ savings per EV; 20% ZEV share by 2027 (ICCT est.) | Short-term price wars erode dealer margins |
| Farmer Relief | Reopens $5B canola market; delays final duties to March 2026 | Escalates if U.S. views it as subsidy dodge |
| Auto Jobs (100K+ at stake) | Spurs competition, innovation from GM/Ford | 30-50% market flood; plant closures like Mexico’s |
| Climate Goals | Accelerates 2035 ZEV target; cuts emissions 5-10% | Delays if mandates stay paused; WTO challenges |
| U.S. Relations | Counters Trump’s 35% tariffs; diversifies from “51st state” talk | Retaliation on USMCA goods; higher cross-border costs |
Public sentiment tilts toward change. A Nanos survey of 1,028 respondents (±3.1% margin) found 62% support (29% strong, 33% moderate), highest among 55+ at 52% for protectionism tempered by affordability.
Anecdotes flood forums: Toronto commuters lament budgets stretched beyond reach, while Reddit threads buzz with calls to “drop it completely” for competition, echoing EU’s case-by-case model over blanket bans.
“An EV fits my life, but not my wallet,” one X user posted, capturing the frustration.
Environmentally, Chinese EVs score high—BYD outsold Tesla globally in Q4 2024—though supply chain ethics (labor, mining) linger as concerns.
Breaking from U.S. overreliance—trade war shaved 2025 GDP forecasts to 1.25%—could redefine Canada.
Carney’s March victory speech rebuked Trump’s jabs: “Canada never, ever will be part of America.”
A Chinese pivot, as second-largest partner, might foster joint plants, spurring U.S. rivals to innovate. But WTO complaints from Beijing post-tariff add hurdles.
Beyond cars, bolder visions emerge: Redirect subsidies to public transit. With urban sprawl fueling car dependency, a $10B rail/bus push could slash new vehicle needs 20-30%, per Calgary Herald analysis.
Toronto’s TTC grapples with aging fleets; Vancouver’s SkyTrain lags. Carney’s “climate competitiveness” could fund EV buses (+50K jobs) or TO-MTL high-speed rail (15% emission cuts, $20B phased).
| Transit Investment Priorities | Impact | Est. Cost |
|---|---|---|
| EV Bus Fleets | 25% urban sales boost | $5B |
| High-Speed Rail (TO-MTL) | 1M fewer cars; 15% CO2 cut | $20B |
| National Bike Lanes | 10% mode shift from driving | $2B |
October 1 beckons. Scrapping tariffs could rebound sales, easing farmer pain and consumer wallets while challenging Musk’s shadow.
Keeping them safeguards jobs but risks climate slippage.
A hybrid—phased cuts to 25%, local sourcing mandates, $2B rebate revival—might thread the needle.
As Carney navigates, one truth endures: Canadians crave EVs that don’t bankrupt them.
Will Ottawa deliver the spark for greener roads, or douse it in protectionism’s flames?
Table of Contents
Why Chinese EVs Are Suddenly on the Table
The tariff review isn’t happening in a vacuum; it’s deeply intertwined with global trade dynamics.
Last October’s 100% levy on Chinese EVs was meant to protect jobs in Ontario’s auto heartland, where assembly plants for Ford, GM, and Stellantis employ tens of thousands.
But China’s swift retaliation—a 100% tariff on Canadian canola oil and meal effective March 20, 2025, followed by a 75.8% anti-dumping duty on canola seed imports starting August 14—has hit farmers hard.
Canola exports to China, worth $5 billion in 2023, now face near-total market closure, affecting Western provinces like Saskatchewan and Alberta.Enter the tariff reconsideration.
Minister MacDonald stated the government is “certainly looking at” reducing or scrapping the EV surtax, potentially as leverage to reopen canola markets.
This aligns with pressure from conservative premiers in canola-heavy regions, who argue that ditching the EV tariff could prompt China to ease agricultural barriers.
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland’s office confirmed an ongoing assessment of China’s trade practices, with results due by October 1, 2025, to determine if the 100% rate remains “appropriate.”
Chinese EVs represent a game-changer in affordability. Models like BYD’s Seagull start at around C$14,600 (pre-tariff), offering 305 km of range, advanced features, and rapid charging—far below Canadian options.
Without the tariff, these vehicles could slash entry barriers, accelerating adoption in a market where price is the top concern for 38% of potential buyers, per Nanos Research.
Globally, Chinese EVs dominate: In 2025, one in four new cars sold worldwide is expected to be electric, with China leading at 40% year-over-year sales growth in 2024.
Yet, this isn’t just about cars; it’s strategic.
TD Economics notes China’s $230 billion in EV subsidies over two decades created overcapacity, but their vehicles match or exceed Western rivals in range (e.g., BYD SUVs at 420-530 km vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E’s 380-515 km).
Allowing imports could force North American automakers to innovate faster, potentially benefiting consumers long-term.
The Tesla Tumble: Musk’s Politics Hit Home
No discussion of Canada’s EV woes is complete without addressing Tesla, once the market leader.
In 2024, Tesla held nearly half of ZEV registrations, but 2025 has seen a collapse: Registrations dropped 67% in the first half, with the brand now under 10% market share.
Several factors converge here, but Elon Musk’s alignment with Trump is a major culprit.
Musk’s endorsement of Trump last summer, followed by his role in the administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—which slashed thousands of federal jobs—has alienated progressive-leaning Canadian buyers.
Trump’s repeated calls for Canada to become the “51st state” and Musk’s echoes of annexation sentiments (despite his Canadian citizenship) have fueled backlash.
Protests, petitions to revoke Musk’s citizenship (with hundreds of thousands of signatures), and viral anti-Musk campaigns in Europe have spilled over.
Compounding this, Tesla’s pricing strategy post-rebate exhaustion—hikes on models like the Model 3 and Y—has priced them out for many.
No Teslas qualify for remaining incentives due to their premium status, and with few sub-$45,000 options overall, sales have cratered. S&P Global Mobility data shows Tesla’s U.S. loyalty rate plunging to 49.9% in March 2025, below industry average, mirroring Canadian trends.
Analysts like Gene Munster attribute this to Musk’s “increased political visibility,” with global deliveries down 13% .
This “Musk factor” has soured the brand: Surveys indicate Canadian sentiment toward Musk has plummeted, with his far-right associations (e.g., support for Germany’s AfD) amplifying distrust.
For buyers eyeing EVs, Tesla’s controversies make alternatives appealing—especially if Chinese models enter tariff-free.
Public Pulse: Canadians Crave Cheaper EVs
Public opinion is tilting toward openness. A Nanos Research survey for CTV News, conducted August 30 to September 2025 with 1,028 respondents, found 62% somewhat or fully support dropping the Chinese EV tariff—hoping to lift canola barriers and lower prices.
This hybrid phone-online poll has a ±3.1% margin of error.
Demographics play a role: Younger Canadians (18-34) show less support for tariffs (33% full support vs. 52% for those 55+), prioritizing affordability over protectionism.
Clean Energy Canada’s Abacus Data poll echoes this: 53% favor a lower tariff balancing industry protection with consumer access, and 29% want full removal. Four in five oppose the current 100% rate, per another survey.
Anecdotally, this resonates. With average new EV prices at $55,000 and tariffs inflating costs, many Canadians—like urban commuters in Toronto or Vancouver—see Chinese EVs as a lifeline. Price tops factors for 38% in Nanos data, dwarfing “made in Canada” (8%).
Yet, 43% still support some tariff, reflecting auto worker concerns in Ontario and Quebec.
This support could drive virality: As social media buzzes about “affordable green rides,” the story taps into economic frustrations amid inflation and trade wars.
Perils for the Auto Sector: An Existential Threat?
Not everyone cheers. Industry experts decry the tariff lift as a “death knell” for Canada’s auto industry.
Flavio Volpe, head of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association (APMA), warns Chinese EVs like BYD or XPeng would “hammer” sales of North American, European, and Japanese models, killing nascent Canadian EV production.
Unifor President Lana Payne calls removal the “worst thing” for workers, potentially displacing jobs in a sector contributing 10% of exports.
The Canadian Steel Producers Association’s Catherine Cobden adds that hurting auto manufacturing ripples to steel, a key customer.
Chinese firms source few parts from Canada, sidelining local suppliers and exacerbating trade imbalances.
With wages in China at $4.20/hour vs. $29 in North America, and 30% faster innovation, competition feels unfair.
U.S. retaliation looms: Dropping tariffs might irk Trump, jeopardizing USMCA benefits. Automakers like GM, already importing Chinese batteries despite tariffs, fear a “tariff fortress” collapse.
Drawing from Mexico’s experience, the caution is stark. Five years ago, EVs were 4% of sales; now, one-third, thanks to Chinese influx.
Mexico hiked tariffs from 20% to 50% in September 2025 to protect jobs, amid U.S. pressure.
Analysts warn Canada could face similar “flooding,” with low-cost EVs (sub-$40,000 holy grail) displacing domestics.
Chinese EVs also raise security flags: Like Huawei’s 5G ban, concerns over cyberespionage in connected vehicles persist.
Five years of tariffs, per execs, could give Western firms time to catch up—BYD’s CEO admits a 3-5 year lead.
Canada faces a tightrope. Dropping tariffs promises affordable EVs, canola relief, and competition—but risks auto jobs, U.S. ire, and security.
Public support (62% per Nanos) and sales woes (39.2% drop) push for change, yet industry voices (APMA, Unifor) decry existential threats.
The review’s October outcome will be pivotal. A hybrid approach—phased reduction, local sourcing mandates—might balance acts.
Meanwhile, amplifying CPTF investments could lessen vehicle dependence, building resilient, green communities.
Ultimately, this isn’t just trade; it’s about sovereignty, sustainability, and affordability. As Trump tariffs bite and China retaliates, Canada must chart its course—toward cheaper EVs, stronger transit, or protected industries.
The choice will define mobility for millions.
Stay Updated with CTC News
